COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND SYSTEMS ANALYSIS

Simulation of Monitoring Multiagent Systems

Authors

M. Yu. Voitekh ORCID 0009-0005-9720-6260
National University "Kyiv Aviation Institute" ROR
O. P. Kravchenko ORCID 0000-0001-7262-0899
National University "Kyiv Aviation Institute" ROR
DOI https://doi.org/10.31649/1997-9266-2026-187-4-83-96

Keywords

environmental monitoring multi-agent systems UAVs wireless sensor networks (WSN) hierarchical simulation

Abstract

The article considers the aspects of simulation of monitoring multi-agent systems (MAS) that combine mobile unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and stationary wireless sensor networks (WSNs). The relevance of the work is determined by the fact that UAV–WSN systems simultaneously involve the physical dynamics of mobile agents, network delays, packet losses, energy constraints of sensor nodes, and inter-agent coordination tasks, which complicates the use of a single universal simulation environment. The aim of the work is to systematize the approaches to the simulation of such systems and to form a criteria-based scheme for selecting a software environment depending on the level of model detail, target metrics, computational costs, and the possibility of transferring results to real-world conditions. The paper distinguishes low, medium, high, and multi-agent levels of modeling, for which the main simulation objects, typical tasks, and key metrics are defined. A multi-criteria scheme for evaluating the suitability of a simulation platform is formed, taking into account the accuracy of reproducing target processes, scalability, suitability for the Sim-to-Real transition, computational costs, and integration complexity. Based on a variant comparison of software environments, appropriate areas of their application for different stages of research are identified: abstract or specialized environments for high-level and multi-agent experiments, robotic 3D simulators for engineering verification of nodes, and discrete-event simulators for the analysis of network processes. For UAV–WSN systems, a hybrid modeling organization scheme is formulated, which involves the use of Python or Mesa/NumPy for testing high-level algorithms, Gazebo or Webots for engineering verification of mobile nodes, and ns-3 or OMNeT++ for detailed analysis of network processes. The practical significance of the work lies in the formation of a methodological framework for coordinating different levels of simulation and reducing the gap between abstract modeling and further engineering verification of UAV–WSN monitoring systems.

1 0

How to Cite

[1]
“Simulation of Monitoring Multiagent Systems”, Вісник ВПІ, no. 4, pp. 83–96, Oct. 2026, doi: 10.31649/1997-9266-2026-187-4-83-96.

Author Biographies

M. Yu. Voitekh, National University "Kyiv Aviation Institute"

Post-Graduate Student of the Chair of Intellectual Cybernetic Systems

 

O. P. Kravchenko, National University "Kyiv Aviation Institute"

Cand. Sc. (Eng.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Chair of Intellectual Cybernetic Systems

References

[1] М. Ю. Войтех, і О. П. Кравченко, «Концепція мультиагентної системи в екологічному моніторингу,» Вісник Вінницького політехнічного інституту, № 4, с. 49-57, 2025. https://doi.org/10.31649/1997-9266-2025-181-4-49-57 .
[2] Kh. Aloui, A. Guizani, M. Hammadi, T. Soriano, M. Haddar, “System Level Specification and Multi-agent Simulation of Manufacturing Systems,” in Ben Amar, M., Bouguecha, A., Ghorbel, E., El Mahi, A., Chaari, F., Haddar, M. (eds) Advances in Materials, Mechanics and Manufacturing II. A3M 2021. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84958-0_4 .
[3] L. Jia, and Y. Pei, “Recent Advances,” in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Intelligent Automation and Control of Water Environment Systems. Machines 2025, 13, 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13060503 .
[4] R. H. Kabir, and K. Lee, “Wildlife monitoring using a multi-UAV system with optimal transport theory,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, p. 4070, Apr. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094070 .
[5] Z. Chen, J. Yan, B. Ma, K. Shi, Q. Yu, and W. Yuan, “A survey on open-source simulation platforms for multi-copter UAV swarms,” Robotics, vol. 12, p. 53, Apr. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics12020053 .
[6] G. H. Adday, S. K. Subramaniam, Z. A. Zukarnain, and N. Samian, “Investigating and analyzing simulation tools of wireless sensor networks: A comprehensive survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 22938-22977, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362889 .
[7] R. G. Sargent, “Verification and validation of simulation models,” Journal of Simulation, vol. 7, pp. 12-24, Feb. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2012.20 .
[8] L. Pitonakova, M. Giuliani, A. Pipe, and A. Winfield, “Feature and performance comparison of the V-REP, Gazebo and ARGoS robot simulators,” in Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 357-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96728-8_30 .
[9] “SITL Simulator (Software in the Loop),” ArduPilot Dev Documentation, 2026. [Electronic resource]. Available: https://ardupilot.org/dev/docs/sitl-simulator-software-in-the-loop.html .
[10] “Simulation,” PX4 User Guide, 2026. [Electronic resource]. Available: https://docs.px4.io/main/en/simulation.
[11] E. Soria, F. Schiano, and D. Floreano, “SwarmLab: A Matlab drone swarm simulator,” in Proc. 2020 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst. (IROS), 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9340854 .
[12] O. Bouaiss, R. Mechgoug, and R. Ajgou, “Modeling, control and simulation of quadrotor UAV,” in Proc. 2020 1st Int. Conf. Commun., Control Syst. Signal Process. (CCSSP), 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCSSP49278.2020.9151687 .
[13] S. Baidya, Z. Shaikh, and M. Levorato, “FlyNetSim: An open source synchronized UAV network simulator based on ns-3 and ArduPilot,” in Proc. 21st ACM Int. Conf. Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242102.3242118 .
[14] C. Pinciroli, et al. “ARGoS: A modular, parallel, multi-engine simulator for multi-robot systems,” Swarm Intelligence, vol. 6, pp. 271-295, Nov. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11721-012-0072-5 .
[15] N. Horri, and M. Pietraszko, “A tutorial and review on flight control co-simulation using Matlab/Simulink and flight simulators,” Automation, vol. 3, pp. 486-510, Sep. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/automation3030025 .
[16] D. Cauwe, C. Wang, and Q. Han, “GazeboNS3: A digital twin system for UAV swarms,” in Proc. 23rd Annual Int. Conf. Mobile Systems, Applications and Services, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1145/3711875.3737659 .
[17] C. Bernardeschi, A. Fagiolini, M. Palmieri, G. Scrima, and F. Sofia, “ROS/Gazebo based simulation of co-operative UAVs,” in Modelling and Simulation for Autonomous Systems. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14984-0_24 .
[18] J. A. Millan-Romera, J. J. Acevedo, Á. R. Castaño, H. Perez-Leon, C. Capitán, and A. Ollero, “A UTM simulator based on ROS and Gazebo,” in Proc. 2019 Workshop Research, Education and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems (RED UAS), 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/REDUAS47371.2019.8999705 .
[19] S. Shah, D. Dey, C. Lovett, and A. Kapoor, “AirSim: High-fidelity visual and physical simulation for autonomous vehicles,” in Field and Service Robotics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 621-635. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67361-5_40 .
[20] E. Rohmer, S. P. N. Singh, and M. Freese, “V-REP: A versatile and scalable robot simulation framework,” in Proc. 2013 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst. (IROS), 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2013.6696520 .
[21] O. Michel, “WebotsTM: Professional mobile robot simulation,” 2004. https://doi.org/10.5772/5618 .
[22] M. Calvo-Fullana, D. Mox, A. Pyattaev, J. Fink, V. Kumar, and A. Ribeiro, “ROS-NetSim: A framework for the integration of robotic and network simulators,” arXiv preprint, 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.10113 .
[23] F. D’Urso, C. Santoro, and F. F. Santoro, “An integrated framework for the realistic simulation of multi-UAV applications,” Computers & Electrical Engineering, vol. 74, pp. 196-209, Mar. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.01.016 .
[24] N. Koenig, and A. Howard, “Design and use paradigms for Gazebo, an open-source multi-robot simulator,” in Proc. 2004 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst. (IROS), 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2004.1389727 .

Most read articles by the same author(s)